Dedre Gentner

Alice Gabrielle Twight Professor of Psychology & Education


Curriculum vitae



(847)467-1272


Department of Psychology

Northwestern University



Analogy and Explanation in Learning Causal System Categories


Journal article


Micah B. Goldwater, D. Gentner
Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 2011

Semantic Scholar DBLP
Cite

Cite

APA   Click to copy
Goldwater, M. B., & Gentner, D. (2011). Analogy and Explanation in Learning Causal System Categories. Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society.


Chicago/Turabian   Click to copy
Goldwater, Micah B., and D. Gentner. “Analogy and Explanation in Learning Causal System Categories.” Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (2011).


MLA   Click to copy
Goldwater, Micah B., and D. Gentner. “Analogy and Explanation in Learning Causal System Categories.” Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 2011.


BibTeX   Click to copy

@article{micah2011a,
  title = {Analogy and Explanation in Learning Causal System Categories},
  year = {2011},
  journal = {Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society},
  author = {Goldwater, Micah B. and Gentner, D.}
}

Abstract

Analogy and Explanation in Learning Causal System Categories Micah Goldwater Northwestern University Dedre Gentner Northwestern University Abstract: Causal system categories- e.g., positive feedback systems, are defined by common causal structure and extend across disparate domains- e.g., population growth and polar ice-cap melting are both governed by positive feedback. However, recognizing common causal systems across domains is challenging. Prior research suggests these categories are not obvious to novices; when participants sorted descriptions of natural phenomena that varied in causal system and content domain, science experts sorted via causal system, while novices primarily sorted by domain (Rottman, Gentner, & Goldwater in prep). In the current study, novices received training with a small set of real-world phenomena before carrying out the sorting task. We varied whether they read full causal explanations of the phenomena and whether they analogically compared pairs of descriptions from the same causal system. Either reading full explanations or analogically comparing descriptions alone helped little. However, combining analogy and explanation largely facilitated causal sorting, approximating expert levels.


Share



Follow this website


You need to create an Owlstown account to follow this website.


Sign up

Already an Owlstown member?

Log in