Dedre Gentner

Alice Gabrielle Twight Professor of Psychology & Education


Curriculum vitae



(847)467-1272


Department of Psychology

Northwestern University



Effects of Language and Similarity on Comparison Processing


Journal article


S. Gelman, L. Raman, D. Gentner
Language Learning and Development, 2009

Semantic Scholar DOI PubMed
Cite

Cite

APA   Click to copy
Gelman, S., Raman, L., & Gentner, D. (2009). Effects of Language and Similarity on Comparison Processing. Language Learning and Development.


Chicago/Turabian   Click to copy
Gelman, S., L. Raman, and D. Gentner. “Effects of Language and Similarity on Comparison Processing.” Language Learning and Development (2009).


MLA   Click to copy
Gelman, S., et al. “Effects of Language and Similarity on Comparison Processing.” Language Learning and Development, 2009.


BibTeX   Click to copy

@article{s2009a,
  title = {Effects of Language and Similarity on Comparison Processing},
  year = {2009},
  journal = {Language Learning and Development},
  author = {Gelman, S. and Raman, L. and Gentner, D.}
}

Abstract

What factors promote conceptual (deep) processing in young children? In this research we examine two factors that seem likely to invite a focus on important conceptual information. The first is comparison processing: comparisons (such as “cats are like dogs”) involve a structural alignment that highlights common relational structure as well as differences connected to that structure. The second factor is the use of generic language (such as “cats have sharp teeth”), which invites a construal organized around information that is relatively central to the represented item. We ask whether these two forces can combine to foster deep processing in 4-year-olds, as well as in adults. Our secondary goal is to test whether the process of comparison operates in the same way in preschool children as in adults. In two studies (N = 132), we examined preschool children's and adults' comparison processing, by asking participants to produce either commonalities or differences for pairs of items while varying similarity (highversus low) and wording (generic versus specific). As predicted, for both ages, (a) high-similarity pairs generated both more commonalities and more alignable differences than low-similarity pairs; (b) generic wording differed from specific language in relatively more deep properties for both ages; and (c) the combination of generic language and high similarity was especially favorable for producing deep properties. The detailed parallels between age groups suggest that the same comparison processes hold for children as for adults. Most important, the results show that two ways of highlighting deep conceptual structure—generic language and structural alignment—can be combined to provide a source of insight for both children and adults.


Share



Follow this website


You need to create an Owlstown account to follow this website.


Sign up

Already an Owlstown member?

Log in