Journal article
1989
Alice Gabrielle Twight Professor of Psychology & Education
(847)467-1272
Department of Psychology
Northwestern University
APA
Click to copy
Forbus, K. D., & Gentner, D. (1989). Structural Evaluation of Analogies : What Counts?
Chicago/Turabian
Click to copy
Forbus, Kenneth D., and D. Gentner. “Structural Evaluation of Analogies : What Counts?” (1989).
MLA
Click to copy
Forbus, Kenneth D., and D. Gentner. Structural Evaluation of Analogies : What Counts? 1989.
BibTeX Click to copy
@article{kenneth1989a,
title = {Structural Evaluation of Analogies : What Counts?},
year = {1989},
author = {Forbus, Kenneth D. and Gentner, D.}
}
Judgments of similarity and soundness are important aspects of human analogical processing. This paper explores how these judgments can be modeled using SME, a simulation of Gentner's structure-mapping theory. We focus on structural evaluation, explicating several principles which psychologically plausible algorithms should follow. We introduce the Speci city Conjecture, which claims that naturalistic representations include a preponderance of appearance and low-order information. We demonstrate via computational experiments that this conjecture a ects how structural evaluation should be performed, including the choice of normalization technique and how the systematicity preference is implemented.